Quote:
|
Many have said "if they can fight for our country they should be allowed to drink"...this is why i brought up the drinking thing, i was just saying it was a matter of time before someone would say that..
|
Quote:
|
and i was right... one has nothing to do with the other, but it's the common argument.
|
You are so right so many argue that if they can fight they should be able to drink. . Putting the two together as if it is a privilege to be able to drink so if they can fight, and vote they should drink too. But what the law is doing (once again) is trying to protect our young adults/older teens from doing something that is wrong for them.
It has been a proven fact that teens and very young adults make wrong decisions when drinking, because they are not yet fully developed mentally and physically there for leading them to take more risks when drinking. It's an age thing.
The military encourages younger adults to join mainly because they are young and not fully developed so there can mold them into soldiers and help them to learn to live as such. If asked the military leader surely tell you that they would not want young adults drinking since it will mentally take away from the learning experiences they are trying to instill.
So using the, "if we can go to war" etc. line to argue to have the drinking age lowered has no real basis or contains nothing as far as facts to help.
So tell me again, what does one have to do with the other? Nothing.
So I totally agree with you. I personally think anyone that tries to put the argument that it does have everything to do with each other shows a lack of maturity. IMHO.