The problem is that no one is thinking. They're just concerned with who has the bigger ... ahem... threat factor and intimidation.
Thing is, everyone involved is completely in the wrong and has made just about every wrong choice they could have.
I'm not going to post a list of links here but go to Google and try: "carlyle group" "north korea" rumsfeld
then try in Google News: "north korea" rumsfeld
Then also in Google News: "north korea" albright
Also, the declassified record:
http://www.gwu.edu/~nsarchiv/NSAEBB/NSAEBB87/
I suggest also doing that search with other names, including "baker", "cheney", "bush" and "clinton"
It becomes obvious pretty quickly that this whole situation has been handled for crap since the start. Madeline Albright is about the only bright spot in the whole thing. She at least tries to be the adult in the classroom full of insane bullies only interested in whose swagger is more grandiose. I mean really, Rumsfeld sells them the tech and then is surprised they used it? The Clinton admin gives them tech and is surprised when they use it? Bush calls them one of the three most "evil" govts in 2001 and then he's surprised when they thumb their nose at us? We sign a treaty with them and then WE break it and impose sanctions against them FOUR DAYS after it's signed? Yeah, no surprise they don't trust us and are ready to call our continued insults and pressure on their sovereign nation an act of war. Then there's N. Korea's leader, a dictator of questionable mental stability to start with who only seems to understand the language of intimidate or be killed.
Long story short, I'll be very surprised if this DOESN'T end in yet another war.