|
I certainly agree with her sentiments 100%.
What personally irks me most is our oh so foolish "rules of engagement".
Somehow we human rights fanatics have forgotten that wars are fought to WIN - not make nice so 'they' will like us. Peace is achieved only through OVERWHELMING VICTORY. And overwhelming victory only happens when there is not enough left of the enemy and it's support system to fight and/or their desire to fight is completely squashed.
So the argument goes that "then we would be no better than they are."
That's right, we have to and should sink to their level to beat them. I would much rather have our country alive and safe and feared and respected than it be dead so that the rest of the world could 'speak well' of us. Why we do not use our superior fighting ability/technology to win this conflict/war against Islamic terrorism quickly and efficiently is sheer folly.
Islam is now engaged in a World War - what don't we understand about that? We give the idea lip service, but are not allowed to use the teeth behind the lips.
Our Dept. of State has and will accomplish absolutely nothing by trying to promote "democracy" in Islamic areas/countries because the ideas/philosophies of democracy the basics/tenants/'philosophy' of Islam are completely mutually exclusive and diametrically opposed ..... period ....that's a FACT.
Judy
__________________
"Saving one dog will not change the world. But, surely, for that one dog the world will change forever."
|
